<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: London selection results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2007/06/london-selection-results.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2007/06/london-selection-results.htm</link>
	<description>Liberal Democrat MP for Hornsey and Wood Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:32:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2007/06/london-selection-results.htm/comment-page-1#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp28/?p=1187#comment-496</guid>
		<description>James,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It is indeed progress in terms of balance.  A 50/50 split is more balanced than a 75/25 split.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The more important point, surely, is that the GLA selection results have consistently shown that there is no inherent bias against women in either the process or the voting.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Neil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>It is indeed progress in terms of balance.  A 50/50 split is more balanced than a 75/25 split.</p>
<p>The more important point, surely, is that the GLA selection results have consistently shown that there is no inherent bias against women in either the process or the voting.</p>
<p>Neil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mash</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2007/06/london-selection-results.htm/comment-page-1#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Mash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp28/?p=1187#comment-495</guid>
		<description>Hi Lynne, &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I hope know how that system works, can someone let me know whether Ajmal was selected to sit on the GLA for Lib Dems. I think Ajmal would be the best candidate. Ajmal is a positive advocate for British Muslims&#039; and passionately speaks up on issues affecting Muslims in Britain today. Lib Dems&#039; are under-represented from BME communities within Parliament and GLA- so it would be good to have a greater representation of people from BME communities. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;Mash</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lynne, </p>
<p>I hope know how that system works, can someone let me know whether Ajmal was selected to sit on the GLA for Lib Dems. I think Ajmal would be the best candidate. Ajmal is a positive advocate for British Muslims' and passionately speaks up on issues affecting Muslims in Britain today. Lib Dems' are under-represented from BME communities within Parliament and GLA- so it would be good to have a greater representation of people from BME communities. </p>
<p>Mash</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2007/06/london-selection-results.htm/comment-page-1#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp28/?p=1187#comment-494</guid>
		<description>In terms of female representation, it is actually REgress.  In 2000, 3 out of the top 4 were women.  I suppose we&#039;ve thus made progress for &#039;balance&#039;, but that was in 2004.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of female representation, it is actually REgress.  In 2000, 3 out of the top 4 were women.  I suppose we've thus made progress for 'balance', but that was in 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Borrowman</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2007/06/london-selection-results.htm/comment-page-1#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Borrowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp28/?p=1187#comment-493</guid>
		<description>&quot;I&#039;m glad that the overall list is so well balanced in terms of men and women - good progress there&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The rules have a gender balance provision, but they have to my knowledge never been invoked. i.e. the list has always been gender balanced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I'm glad that the overall list is so well balanced in terms of men and women - good progress there"</p>
<p>The rules have a gender balance provision, but they have to my knowledge never been invoked. i.e. the list has always been gender balanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2007/06/london-selection-results.htm/comment-page-1#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp28/?p=1187#comment-492</guid>
		<description>My typo - now fixed. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My typo - now fixed. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Valladares</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2007/06/london-selection-results.htm/comment-page-1#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Valladares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp28/?p=1187#comment-491</guid>
		<description>Lynne,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Nine, not ten... Shas Sheehan and Merlene Emerson being the relevant candidates...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynne,</p>
<p>Nine, not ten... Shas Sheehan and Merlene Emerson being the relevant candidates...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
