Any time you can receive a mobile signal; place and receive calls; you’re already swamped in the radio transmissions of the tower.

Additionally, the human race has been exposed to large amounts of radio transmissions since our friend Marconi rolled out the wireless almost a hundred years ago.

While I understand that you are not a physicist, I must argue for the sake of scientific accuracy that cellular towers have been studied extensively over the last twenty years they’ve been used, and have never been linked to a single health ailment.

Each day, you and I both soak up far more electromagnetic radiation from the sun than we could ever get, even if we stood directly next to a cell phone transmitter.

All this looks rather like nimbies (Not in my back yard) with mobile phones responding to tabloid scare stories. (or is it just spoiling their view?)

Below is a quote from the Health Protection Agency:
“The weight of evidence now available does not suggest that there are adverse health effects from exposures to RF fields below guideline levels”

Whilst there is an argument to apply the ‘precuationary principle’ there are much greater risks we should be concentrating on. (e.g i note the number of large SUV 4 wheel drive vehicles parked on mountview road. The health risk posed by these vehicles is well documented, but of course this only applies to people outside the vehicle.
Nigel. Ridge Road N8

In fact BT is now being required to share its land line network, and they are allowed to charge a (carefully) regulated amount for this. Network sharing could have a number of benefits -more efficient use of radio frequencies, encouragement of innovation, and it would also reduce the number of issues of this kind…

Now why doesn’t that surprise me?

I’m saddened. Truly saddened.