<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monarchy revisited: why should sexism in the choice of monarch be acceptable?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2008/01/monarchy-revisited-why-should-sexism-in.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2008/01/monarchy-revisited-why-should-sexism-in.htm</link>
	<description>Liberal Democrat MP for Hornsey and Wood Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:02:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huge public support for removing sex discrimination in royal inheritance &#124; Mark Pack</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2008/01/monarchy-revisited-why-should-sexism-in.htm/comment-page-1#comment-10029</link>
		<dc:creator>Huge public support for removing sex discrimination in royal inheritance &#124; Mark Pack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp28/?p=1531#comment-10029</guid>
		<description>[...] in the last Parliament, with Lynne getting widespread media coverage for her mini-campaign and commenting:For me the basic point is quite simple: the monarchy is meant to be a symbol for our country, so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the last Parliament, with Lynne getting widespread media coverage for her mini-campaign and commenting:For me the basic point is quite simple: the monarchy is meant to be a symbol for our country, so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2008/01/monarchy-revisited-why-should-sexism-in.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6633</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp28/?p=1531#comment-6633</guid>
		<description>Well well, fancy us being taken back to the days when Lynne was pretending to be an opponent of the Tories rather than actually being one.

Needless to say her argument then was pseudo Tory in any event- not shall we address the issue of the monarchy-  but rather there is sexism in the law of succession blah blah.

How about we go a logical stage further and recognise that we are a mature democracy that does not need a monarchy- constitutional or otherwise- and all the associated inherited hierarchical claptrap that goes with it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well well, fancy us being taken back to the days when Lynne was pretending to be an opponent of the Tories rather than actually being one.</p>
<p>Needless to say her argument then was pseudo Tory in any event- not shall we address the issue of the monarchy-  but rather there is sexism in the law of succession blah blah.</p>
<p>How about we go a logical stage further and recognise that we are a mature democracy that does not need a monarchy- constitutional or otherwise- and all the associated inherited hierarchical claptrap that goes with it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Shires &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Huge public support for removing sex discrimination in royal inheritance</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2008/01/monarchy-revisited-why-should-sexism-in.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6631</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Shires &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Huge public support for removing sex discrimination in royal inheritance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 06:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp28/?p=1531#comment-6631</guid>
		<description>[...] in the last Parliament, with Lynne getting widespread media coverage for her mini-campaign and commenting: For me the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the last Parliament, with Lynne getting widespread media coverage for her mini-campaign and commenting: For me the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2008/01/monarchy-revisited-why-should-sexism-in.htm/comment-page-1#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp28/?p=1531#comment-871</guid>
		<description>Surely much of the objection is from people who believe that a good wife does what her husband tells her (thereby giving the throne to a male consort rather than a queen) -- harder to counter than a simple &quot;boys and girls should inherit equally&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely much of the objection is from people who believe that a good wife does what her husband tells her (thereby giving the throne to a male consort rather than a queen) &#8212; harder to counter than a simple &#8220;boys and girls should inherit equally&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lib Dem member</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2008/01/monarchy-revisited-why-should-sexism-in.htm/comment-page-1#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>Lib Dem member</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp28/?p=1531#comment-870</guid>
		<description>Bloody good start to your new job - good symbolic issue - imaginative idea - more press coverage - and annoying smug Tories - well done Lynne!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloody good start to your new job &#8211; good symbolic issue &#8211; imaginative idea &#8211; more press coverage &#8211; and annoying smug Tories &#8211; well done Lynne!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

