Comments on: What should you do with your emails? http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2009/01/what-should-you-do-with-your-emails.htm Liberal Democrat MP for Hornsey and Wood Green Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:18:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Anonymous http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2009/01/what-should-you-do-with-your-emails.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1625 Anonymous Wed, 03 Jun 2009 02:11:13 +0000 http://localhost/wp28/?p=2053#comment-1625 If you were Home Secretary, would you claim expenses for your husband's porn or would you expect him to pay for it himself? If you were Home Secretary, would you claim expenses for your husband's porn or would you expect him to pay for it himself?

]]> By: Stephen http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2009/01/what-should-you-do-with-your-emails.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1624 Stephen Mon, 04 May 2009 17:39:00 +0000 http://localhost/wp28/?p=2053#comment-1624 I found the fact it's only keeping records of sender, recipient etc a bit weird - that's going to send a ton of terrorists to jail, isn't it? <br /><br />You don't get any evidence from that, you've even still got to send someone round to ask, in person, about the email and what happened to be in it and I'm not enough of a Hercule Poirot to see how you could prevent anything much with it. I found the fact it's only keeping records of sender, recipient etc a bit weird - that's going to send a ton of terrorists to jail, isn't it?

You don't get any evidence from that, you've even still got to send someone round to ask, in person, about the email and what happened to be in it and I'm not enough of a Hercule Poirot to see how you could prevent anything much with it.

]]> By: dreamingspire http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2009/01/what-should-you-do-with-your-emails.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1623 dreamingspire Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:54:00 +0000 http://localhost/wp28/?p=2053#comment-1623 The Facebook page that you point to fails to point out that it is only communications data (apparent author, recipient, date, time, IP address...) that it is proposed to keep, and NOT the content of emails, texts, etc. Still wrong to do it, though. Lesson 1: fight with the truth, not with ambiguity or even exaggeration. The Facebook page that you point to fails to point out that it is only communications data (apparent author, recipient, date, time, IP address...) that it is proposed to keep, and NOT the content of emails, texts, etc. Still wrong to do it, though. Lesson 1: fight with the truth, not with ambiguity or even exaggeration.

]]>