Lynne Featherstone

MP for Hornsey and Wood Green

my blog
Lynne's Parliament and Haringey Diary, established 2003

What’s going on at Alexandra Palace?

Alexandra PalaceHere’s my latest column for the Highgate Handbook and Muswell Hill Flyer:

Beautiful building, fantastic location – but a financial nightmare. That’s been the history of Alexandra Palace over the last few decades as one bungle after another has seen tens of millions of pounds wasted – with the bill for clearing these losses landed on the Haringey Council Tax payer.

Over the last couple of years we’ve seen Haringey Labour desperately trying to wash their hands of the problem – but wanting to do so by selling off much of the site on a mammoth 125 year lease to a private developer. A deal was sort-of struck with Firoka, which has since fallen through – leaving Haringey facing a £6.2 million claim from Firoka.

Liberal Democrat councillors have repeatedly criticised this deal – the way in which it was rushed through, the lack of decent public consultation, the lack of proper safeguards in the deal (especially for the historic TV studios) – and the failure to sort out crucial details.

Following the collapse of the deal, there have been two independent investigations – both with damning conclusions about how Labour councillors have behaved. The second one – known as Walklate 2 – concludes that “entering into and maintaining the licence [with Firoka for them to take over Alexandra Palace] has led to losses to the Trust in the region of £1,500,000. The Trustees were not given financial information of the effect of the licence … nor were they given the opportunity to consider whether they wished to revoke the licence.” That is £1.5 million in losses in addition to the £6.2 million claim.

As the reports have shown, the Trustees of Alexandra Palace were kept in the dark about major parts of the deal, they were not told of the concerns raised by some staff and they were not told key financial information either. In other words – there was such a drive to try to get Ally Pally off Haringey’s hands that things were rushed, kept secret and done badly.

The report also concludes that, “There is a moral imperative on any senior management team, particularly in the public sector, to take collective responsibility for such matter and this simply did not happen.” Mistakes, losses – but no-one carries the can other than the rest of us – who have to pick up the pieces through our Council Tax bills.

You just wonder when this pantomime of hideous errors and misdeeds will end; when we the taxpayers will stop having to foot the bill for incompetence and possibly worse and when our beloved Ally Pally will be free of the smell of things not quite right. Next local elections perhaps?

If you missed it before, you can still watch my short YouTube film about Ally Pally.

Fri 29 May 2009
Other stories on similar subjects: ,
Tweet thisShare on FacebookAdd to DeliciousDigg itLibDig this

Comments

  1. Roy says:

    While I don’t think it would be possible to mess things up any more than our Labour council already has, I would love to know what the Lib Dems have planned for Ally Pally should they win the next local election.

  2. Mr AyJay Hornybloke says:

    I am a Haringey Council Resident since 1993. I could see Alexandra Palace from my balcony and often thought: “the park is a nature reserve, the building is superbly imposing, capable of hosting a variety of events and on top of that, it’s got history”.
    Now that is an asset! The Council may have to spend £1m a year but the revenues from it should far exceed that. Also, one does not sell off assets like that, especially as the flashes from the broadcasting mast are part of Council’s coat of arms. If the Council desires to sell off this wonderful asset, they might just as well close themselves down, as there is only Bruce Castle left, and that does not compare at all with Ally Pally.

  3. Lynne Featherstone MP says:

    Roy – independent trustees!

  4. Clive Carter says:

    Independent Trustees:

    Hear hear!

    The latest AP Board line, a device and instrument of the current majority group, ensures that there will be political control of the Board through majority voting. Far from being independent, the chairman also of the majority group.

    This is not how a Charity is supposed to operate. Party political control over the years has led to great waste and missed opportunities.

    The most constructive thing the current Board could do would be formally to renounce the long-held policy of sale. This misconceived and misguided policy is now discredited but the Board has not formally recongnized that.

    The council may agree to lift the (bogus) debt that has long blighted AP’s future. A renunciation of the sale policy would be a further step to lifting the cloud that has prevented long term planning and put a brake on bookings by the trading arm of our Charity.

    Clive Carter

  5. Col says:

    I agree with the idea of independent trustees.

    There must be plenty of people like myself in the area with expertise in property, regeneration, public administration and finance who would be glad to help bring our much loved but neglected palace to live – and who would have the background and experience to scrutinise proposals properly.

    They just need to ask.

Website terms of use

Published and promoted by C. Jenkinson on behalf of Haringey Liberal Democrats, both at 62 High Street, N8 7NX and by S. Drage on behalf of the Liberal Democrats, both at Unit 1, Streatham Business Centre, 1 Empire Mews, SW16 2EH.

Site produced by Puffbox in association with Harrisment.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licenced under a Creative Commons Licence.