<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proof is in the pocket: the Equality Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2009/06/proof-is-in-pocket-equality-bill.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2009/06/proof-is-in-pocket-equality-bill.htm</link>
	<description>Liberal Democrat MP for Hornsey and Wood Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:02:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gender pay audits: government to try voluntary route first, option for mandatory audits remains &#124; Mark Pack</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2009/06/proof-is-in-pocket-equality-bill.htm/comment-page-1#comment-10033</link>
		<dc:creator>Gender pay audits: government to try voluntary route first, option for mandatory audits remains &#124; Mark Pack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp28/?p=2265#comment-10033</guid>
		<description>[...] 48% of men think men and women are paid equally but only 32% of women.Yet as Lynne Featherstone has previously blogged:All too often equal pay is seen as just a women’s issue, but what about the business culture [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 48% of men think men and women are paid equally but only 32% of women.Yet as Lynne Featherstone has previously blogged:All too often equal pay is seen as just a women’s issue, but what about the business culture [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2009/06/proof-is-in-pocket-equality-bill.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2052</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp28/?p=2265#comment-2052</guid>
		<description>&quot;The flashing fluorescent elephant in the room when it comes to employment discrimination is of course equal pay for women&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;barely a day goes by without some governemtn minister whingin about pay for women, or coming up with some inflacted pay gap figures. And they&#039;re forever coming up with ways to give women more money by introducing quotes, and legalising discrimination against men. I really can&#039;t think of a more inapproriate turn of phrase!.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The real elephant in the room would be really obvious and serious issues that no one ever talks about nor addresses, for example the fact that men have to wait five years longer to actually be able to get their state pension, thus we&#039;re paying billions and billions more to women, and giving them a much better reitrement.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On top of that men of course die younger (many because they&#039;ve worked too many hours for too long), so the actually inequality in amount paid out is absolutely immense.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thsi is real genuine sex discrimiantion. There&#039;s no doubt or debate to be had and there&#039;s no complex array of factor involved. it si plain and simple state sponsored sex discrimination and it&#039;s incredible that it still exists in the 21st century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;The flashing fluorescent elephant in the room when it comes to employment discrimination is of course equal pay for women&quot;</p>
<p>barely a day goes by without some governemtn minister whingin about pay for women, or coming up with some inflacted pay gap figures. And they&#39;re forever coming up with ways to give women more money by introducing quotes, and legalising discrimination against men. I really can&#39;t think of a more inapproriate turn of phrase!.</p>
<p>The real elephant in the room would be really obvious and serious issues that no one ever talks about nor addresses, for example the fact that men have to wait five years longer to actually be able to get their state pension, thus we&#39;re paying billions and billions more to women, and giving them a much better reitrement.</p>
<p>On top of that men of course die younger (many because they&#39;ve worked too many hours for too long), so the actually inequality in amount paid out is absolutely immense.</p>
<p>Thsi is real genuine sex discrimiantion. There&#39;s no doubt or debate to be had and there&#39;s no complex array of factor involved. it si plain and simple state sponsored sex discrimination and it&#39;s incredible that it still exists in the 21st century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

