<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Airbrushed Twiggy removed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2009/12/airburshed-twiggy-removed.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2009/12/airburshed-twiggy-removed.htm</link>
	<description>Liberal Democrat MP for Hornsey and Wood Green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:02:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harriet Harms Man</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2009/12/airburshed-twiggy-removed.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2619</link>
		<dc:creator>Harriet Harms Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/?p=5676#comment-2619</guid>
		<description>Grumpy - to be fair the occasional Lib Dem has mentioned men in passing when discussing this, though as with most men&#039;s issues it&#039;s very much the tiniest of afterthoughts rather than a genuine concern (that still puts them ahead of Labour though where men aren&#039;t even an afterthought).

For men it&#039;s far worse than a bit of airbrushing - they&#039;re supposed to aspire to look like pumped up muscular freaks , with steroid use and ridiculous lengths of time in the gym the only possible way to achieve such a physique.

The real question should maybe be why restrict it to focusing on airbrushing and how about having to state whether or not your models had to abuse extremely harmful and illegal drugs to achieve their physique?

At least airbrushing doesn&#039;t actually damage the actual model&#039;s health , nor turn them into some angry violent monster with fertility problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grumpy &#8211; to be fair the occasional Lib Dem has mentioned men in passing when discussing this, though as with most men&#8217;s issues it&#8217;s very much the tiniest of afterthoughts rather than a genuine concern (that still puts them ahead of Labour though where men aren&#8217;t even an afterthought).</p>
<p>For men it&#8217;s far worse than a bit of airbrushing &#8211; they&#8217;re supposed to aspire to look like pumped up muscular freaks , with steroid use and ridiculous lengths of time in the gym the only possible way to achieve such a physique.</p>
<p>The real question should maybe be why restrict it to focusing on airbrushing and how about having to state whether or not your models had to abuse extremely harmful and illegal drugs to achieve their physique?</p>
<p>At least airbrushing doesn&#8217;t actually damage the actual model&#8217;s health , nor turn them into some angry violent monster with fertility problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpy Old Man</title>
		<link>http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/2009/12/airburshed-twiggy-removed.htm/comment-page-1#comment-2618</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpy Old Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org/?p=5676#comment-2618</guid>
		<description>Young men are also in the firing line for unrealistic body images - just look at the Christmas &quot;Fragrance&quot; Ads for starters.  Why restrict your campaign to the protection of gullible females? Their male contemporaries are also equally gullible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Young men are also in the firing line for unrealistic body images &#8211; just look at the Christmas &#8220;Fragrance&#8221; Ads for starters.  Why restrict your campaign to the protection of gullible females? Their male contemporaries are also equally gullible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

